Welcome!

ColdFusion Authors: Yakov Fain, Maureen O'Gara, Nancy Y. Nee, Tad Anderson, Daniel Kaar

Related Topics: ColdFusion

ColdFusion: Article

Which Is Faster?

Which Is Faster?

Which is faster, <CFQUERY> or <CFLOOP>? Which is faster, CFML or <CFSCRIPT>? Which is faster... ? If you're a ColdFusion developer, chances are that you've asked (or have been asked) these questions and others like them.

So, Which Is Faster?
Okay, so which option is actually the faster one? Honestly? I'm not so sure. Once upon a time (pre-CF4) we were told that <CFLOOP> was very slow. Then (when CF4 shipped) we were told that <CFLOOP> had been optimized and outperformed <CFOUTPUT>. And now, well, CFMX changes everything. So, which is faster?

Of course, performance-related questions are legitimate. We all keep looking for ways to tweak just a little more oomph from our code. But the truth is that this is not just a CFML syntax concern; this affects all sorts of code, database calls, design considerations, reuse implementations, and more.

ColdFusion debugging helps us out a little here. Execution time (for a complete page or parts thereof) provides an invaluable peek under the CF covers. But for more granular performance comparisons, for detailed benchmarking, and for ascertaining definitive performance data, debug output falls a bit short.

Enter ColdFusion MX
Ever since ColdFusion MX shipped I've been trying to better understand exactly what the product is doing internally so as to be able to write better code. And like many of you, I've discovered that an interesting side effect of ColdFusion's new processing engine is that many of the tips and tricks I lived by don't really apply anymore; some have negligible effects on my code, and others are just plain wrong. So I created an application, a really simple performance comparison tool, using good old ColdFusion. This tool has proven so invaluable that I feel compelled to share it with you. Read on.

Measuring Execution Time
The key to measuring any execution time in ColdFusion is an intriguing little function named GetTickCount(). GetTickCount() takes no parameters, and returns a number that is, in and of itself, rather useless. So what makes GetTickCount() so intriguing? The number that GetTickCount() returns is a value in milliseconds, and invoking GetTickCount() exactly one second after a prior GetTickCount() invocation returns a value exactly 1000 times greater than the first returned value.

In other words, to determine exactly how long a line of code takes to execute, you could do the following:

<CFSET start=GetTickCount()>
... some CFML code ...
<CFSET end=GetTickCount()>
<CFSET executiontime=end-start>

Measuring a single execution yields no usable data - a single invocation may run faster or slower at any time based on lots of other factors (ColdFusion factors and otherwise). To really measure execution time, code must be executed repeatedly, and each iteration must be measured individually and stored. Then an average execution time can be determined by processing all of the saved values.

The simplest way to do this in ColdFusion is to loop through the iterations, saving each measurement to an array, perhaps like this:

<CFSET start=GetTickCount()>
...some CFML code...
<CFSET end=GetTickCount()>
<CFSET ArrayAppend(timings, end-start)>

Then to obtain the average execution time you could simply use:

#ArrayAvg(timings)#

Similarly, total execution time, slowest iteration, and fastest iteration could easily be determined using array functions like this:

Total: #ArraySum(timings)#
Slowest: #ArrayMax(timings)#
Fastest: #ArrayMin(timings)#

To compare the processing of two options you'd simply repeat this process twice (saving the data to two arrays, one for each option), and then compare the results.

Presenting Results
Detailed benchmarking data is useless unless it can be presented in a format that makes it clear and understandable. <CFCHART> (and related tags) makes it easy to plot the data in a highly usable and readable format.

<CFCHART> is usually used to chart database query results, but as this code snippet demonstrates, individual data points can be passed explicitly using the <CFCHARTDATA> tag. In this example, two arrays (named timings1 and timings2) are being charted in individual data series in a single chart. The inner loops loop from 1-100, and on each iteration, passes the appropriate array value (from both arrays) to <CFCHART>.

<!--- Graph it --->
<CFCHART FORMAT="flash"
SHOWMARKERS="no">
<CFCHARTSERIES TYPE="line"
SERIESLABEL="Option 1 Title"
SERIESCOLOR="red">
<CFLOOP FROM="1" TO="100" INDEX="i">
<CFCHARTDATA ITEM="#i#"
VALUE="#timings1[i]#">
</CFLOOP>
</CFCHARTSERIES>
<CFCHARTSERIES TYPE="line"
SERIESLABEL="Option 2 Title"
SERIESCOLOR="green">
<CFLOOP FROM="1" TO="100" INDEX="i">
<CFCHARTDATA ITEM="#i#"
VALUE="#timings2[i]#">
</CFLOOP>
</CFCHARTSERIES>
</CFCHART>
Putting It All Together
Over the past few months I've found myself using code much like what I described above over and over. So to make testing quicker and cleaner, I created the "Which is Faster?" application. The app is actually incredibly simple; the idea is as follows:
  • The two coding options (perhaps <CFLOOP QUERY=""> and <CFOUTPUT QUERY="">) are each placed in their own .cfm files. (I named mine loop.cfm and output.cfm).
  • Some tests may require the execution of code that is not part of the actual test (for example, to test <CFLOOP> and <CFOUTPUT> you'd need a query to be executed, but you'd not want it to be executed along with the <CFLOOP> and <CFOUTPUT> tags), so that code is placed in its own .cfm file. (I named mine query.cfm.)
  • A form prompts for the names of these files, descriptions, as well as the number of iterations to use when testing.
  • The form submits to a processing page that first includes the preprocessor page (if one was specified) and then loops as instructed, including each test file and saving the execution times to arrays, which are then used by <CFCHART> tags to chart the performance.

    For my own testing (to test <CFLOOP> versus <CFOUTPUT>) I used three files. Here they are:

    QUERY.CFM
    <CFQUERY DATASOURCE="exampleapps"
    NAME="emps">
    SELECT *
    FROM tblEmployees
    ORDER BY LastName, FirstName
    </CFQUERY>

    OUTPUT.CFM
    <CFOUTPUT QUERY="emps">
    </CFOUTPUT>

    LOOP.CFM
    <CFLOOP QUERY="emps">
    </CFLOOP>

    These are simple, crude, and not real-world at all. But they are perfect for this type of testing - you wouldn't want lots of other processing included, as that could skew the results.

    FORM.CFM (Listing 1) contains the code for the form, a simple HTML form as described above (see Figure 1). One checkbox worth noting is the "Exclude first iteration" option; as ColdFusion may have to compile the code on the first execution, you may not want to include that in the collected data (as it will skew the results, creating a much slower first value).

    PROCESS.CFM (Listing 2) processes the form. The code first uses <CFPARAM> and a series of <CFIF> statements to validate and prepare passed values. If a preprocessor file was specified, it is then executed. Next, if the "Exclude first iteration" option was checked, each included file is executed once (using <CFINCLUDE> tags) so as to force a compile if needed. Then comes the test itself; <CFLOOP> loops from 1 to the specified number of iterations and, within each iteration, both files are executed and the timings for each appended to one of two arrays (one for each test). Finally the results are displayed in five graphs (see Figure 2). The first shows the execution details, and the next four show total processing time, average iteration processing time, as well as fastest and slowest iteration processing time. (In case you were wondering why I used two arrays instead of a single two-dimensional array, these last four graphs are the reason; functions like ArraySum() and ArrayAvg() work on single dimensional arrays only).

    Where to Go from Here
    Of course, writing all this down has gotten me thinking. It would be nice if instead of just including files with <CFINCLUDE> the application would give you a choice and also allow:

    • <CFHTTP> calls to complete pages, local or remote
    • <CFINVOKE> calls to Web services or ColdFusion Components
    • <CFMODULE> calls to Custom Tags
    It's tempting to modify the app right now, but so as to get this column in, I'll leave this enhancement for you to work on. If you find the application useful and enhance it, please let me know.

    Conclusion
    So, which is faster, <CFLOOP> or <CFOUTPUT>? Answer: <CFLOOP> seems slightly faster, but there is so little difference it's essentially insignificant. Which is faster, CFML or <CFSCRIPT>? Answer: almost no difference (unless I ran ridiculously large tests, as in 10,000 assignments per iteration). Which is faster? Now you can find out yourself - and not just with CFML language elements, but whole blocks of functionality, pages, SQL statements, and more. Enjoy!

  • More Stories By Ben Forta

    Ben Forta is Adobe's Senior Technical Evangelist. In that capacity he spends a considerable amount of time talking and writing about Adobe products (with an emphasis on ColdFusion and Flex), and providing feedback to help shape the future direction of the products. By the way, if you are not yet a ColdFusion user, you should be. It is an incredible product, and is truly deserving of all the praise it has been receiving. In a prior life he was a ColdFusion customer (he wrote one of the first large high visibility web sites using the product) and was so impressed he ended up working for the company that created it (Allaire). Ben is also the author of books on ColdFusion, SQL, Windows 2000, JSP, WAP, Regular Expressions, and more. Before joining Adobe (well, Allaire actually, and then Macromedia and Allaire merged, and then Adobe bought Macromedia) he helped found a company called Car.com which provides automotive services (buy a car, sell a car, etc) over the Web. Car.com (including Stoneage) is one of the largest automotive web sites out there, was written entirely in ColdFusion, and is now owned by Auto-By-Tel.

    Comments (2) View Comments

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    Most Recent Comments
    ramaa rajan 12/03/03 11:09:27 AM EST

    I would like to capture the execution time of each page as it displayed in the browser. GetTickCount() function gives a slightly different result. Can you pls tell me how. Thanks a lot

    07/24/03 12:51:00 PM EDT
    @ThingsExpo Stories
    One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
    Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
    The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
    Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
    Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
    We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
    "Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
    How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
    The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
    Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
    The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
    P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
    The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
    Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
    Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
    The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
    Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
    SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
    "There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
    The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...