Click here to close now.

Welcome!

You will be redirected in 30 seconds or close now.

ColdFusion Authors: Yakov Fain, Maureen O'Gara, Nancy Y. Nee, Tad Anderson, Daniel Kaar

Related Topics: ColdFusion

ColdFusion: Article

Fusebox 3.0

Fusebox 3.0

It's finally here! For months, the lights have burned late and e-mails have flown furiously as work proceeded on the latest version of the Fusebox specification, version 3.0. It was released to rave reviews at the Fusebox 2001 conference held in Orlando on October 20, the Saturday prior to Macromedia's DevCon.

Someone once said that people should never see how laws or sausages are made. I think I can safely add technical standards to that list. There have been passionate arguments and some painful missteps along the way, but that's all eclipsed as people begin discovering the new power and ease-of-use in Fusebox 3.0.

What's New in Fusebox 3.0
Here's a rundown of some of the key features:

  • A nested model for communication between circuits created to make reuse and distributed development easier
  • A nested layout model that opens up possibilities for highly dynamic, flexible layouts
  • XML-based Fusedoc providing both PDL (Program Definition Language) and documentation for fuses
  • A stable set of key files that forms a Fusebox skeleton, making the learning process easier for people new to Fusebox and making it much easier to generate a new Fusebox application
  • Exit fuseactions (XFAs) for greater reusability of fuses and circuits
  • An API that exposes key variables within a Fusebox structure defined by the key Fusebox file
Fusebox Component Files
The core Fusebox files begin with an FBX_ prefix. A sample application is assumed with the circuit structure shown in Figure 1.

The component Fusebox files are:

FBX_Settings.cfm
This file is optional and is used to set variables that are needed by the application. Each circuit may have its own FBX_Settings.cfm file. If a fuseaction such as grandchild.main is resolved to home/parent/ child/grandchild.main, FBX_ Settings.cfm will be called in each directory in order. This allows you to set general variables at higher levels and override them, if needed, in child directories. This file replaces myGlobals.cfm, app_ Globals.cfm, and app_Locals.cfm.

FBX_Circuits.cfm
Required in the home circuit, FBX_ Circuits.cfm maps circuit aliases to physical paths. In the sample application shown, the contents of FBX_Circuits.cfm are:

<cfscript> Fusebox.Circuits.home = 'Grandparent'; Fusebox.Circuits.parent = 'Grandparent/Parent'; Fusebox.Circuits.Child = 'Grandparent/Parent/Child'; Fusebox.Circuits.grandchild = 'Grandparent/Parent/Child/Grandchild'; </cfscript>
The circuit alias is a key within a structure called Circuits, with the reserved structure Fusebox. The circuit alias doesn't have to be the same name as the physical directory, as shown by aliasing the top directory (Grandparent) as home. This allows for directories at different levels to have the same name.

FBX_Switch.cfm
This file is placed in every circuit that handles fuseactions; FBX_Switch.cfm is a <cfswitch> statement with <cfcase>s for every fuseaction the individual circuit is to handle.

FBX_Layouts.cfm
Required in any circuit that implements a separate layout file, FBX_Layouts.cfm is responsible for setting the variables, Fusebox.layoutDir and Fusebox.layoutFile. The layout file pointed to in Fusebox.layoutFile must, at a minimum, output Fusebox.layout. Conditional processing is possible within FBX_Layouts.cfm. If, for example, a child sets a Boolean variable called QueryReturnedRecords, a parent might implement this simple logic in FBX_Layouts.cfm:

<cfif QueryReturnedRecords> <cfset Fusebox.layoutFile="SortableTableLayout.cfm"> <cfelse> <cfset Fusebox.layoutFile="EmptyRecordLayout.cfm"> </cfif>
FBX_SaveContent.cfm
Used if the ColdFusion server version is below version 5.0, this file is the widely popular <cf_bodycontent> tag.

FBX_Fusebox30
Of the files FBX_Fusebox30_CF50.cfm, FBX_Fusebox30_CF45.cfm, and FBX_Fusebox30_CF40.cfm, only one will be called in index.cfm, depending on which version of ColdFusion server is running. The index.cfm file should have this code in it:

<cfif Val(ListGetAt(Server.ColdFusion.ProductVersion, 1)) LT "5"> <cfif Val(ListGetAt(Server.ColdFusion.ProductVersion, 2)) is "5"> <cfinclude template="fbx_fusebox30 _CF45.cfm"> <cfelse> <cfinclude template="fbx_fusebox30_ CF40.cfm"> </cfif> <cfelse> <cfinclude template="fbx_fusebox30_CF50.cfm"> </cfif>
Note: If you create circuit applications, the only file that's absolutely required for a circuit that only runs beneath other circuits is the fbx_switch.cfm file. The other files are needed only if you have special settings to set and special layouts to handle. Circuits are defined only in the home circuit. Of course, you do have to supply your own fuseactions and fuses; we had to leave some of the work for you, after all!

In addition to the core Fusebox files, DefaultLayout.cfm is provided. This file simply outputs Fusebox.layout. This is a useful file when you don't care about a given circuit adding any layouts and simply want it to display the layout. Note, however, that while the fuseaction path must have one layout file, you don't need any files in circuits that don't have any special layout requirements. In the "family" application whose directory structure is shown in Figure 1, a request for grandchild.main might, for example, have layout handled in only one of the circuits involved. In such a case the other circuits wouldn't require an FBX_Layouts.cfm file nor the use of DefaultLayout.cfm.

Reserved Variables: The Fusebox 3.0 API
There are two complex variable structures. The first, the FB_ structure, is used for internal calculations by the FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm file. You should neither read nor write to this structure since it will immediately render your code non-Fusebox 3.0-compliant and may well break your application.

The second reserved variable structure is the public "API" called Fusebox (see Table 1). Again, you shouldn't make any changes to this API. You'll find some variables within this structure very useful. You can use these public variables anywhere within your code, as any changes to the Fusebox standard will support these variables going forward, even if the underlying code that calculates these variables is modified.

Core Fusebox 3.0 Concepts
With the new terminology, API, and required files under our belts, let's turn our attention to the latest additions to the "core Fusebox" methodology that makes its appearance in Fusebox 3.0. These are exit fuseactions (XFAs), Fusedocs, and nested circuits.

XFAs address issues of severability and reuse; Fusedocs address code documentation, especially in a distributed developer environment; nested circuits address inheritance, layouts, and exception handling. Although these are largely separate concepts, they do weave into the overall Fusebox scheme and are absolutely essential toward realizing the advantages that Fusebox 3 can deliver.

Exit Fuseactions (XFAs)
The first of the new concepts for Fusebox 3.0 is exit fuseactions. XFAs are the identified exit points of a particular fuse. In Fusebox the meaning of an exit point is not "Where do we go next?" (we always go back to the fusebox!), but rather, "What fuseaction are we going to take upon our return to the fusebox?"

For example, take the case where a user fills out a form to win the $1 million we're giving away. The user begins by getting an exciting, unexpected e-mail from us (really, it's not spam!) on which appears a link (see Figure 2):

<a href="http://scamsRus.com/index.cfm? fuseaction=showContestForm">Click here to win a million dollars</a>
When the user submits that form, we want to store the information to a database while the user expectantly awaits a celebrity spokesperson's arrival with a substantial cashier's check. Regardless of what the spokesperson does, the form had only one possible way to return to the fusebox - by the user clicking the OK button. We might assign an exit fuseaction of "saveToDatabase" to that exit point, and represent it like this:
<form action="index.cfm?fuseaction=saveTo Database" method="post">
The problem with such a fuseaction is that it's a hard reference. To reuse the fuse - either in a new application or in a new context in the same application - I need to either change code or introduce conditional logic into the fuse. Neither path is optimal.

A much better way to handle our sample case is to identify the exit points of a fuse - those paths out of the fuse - and to assign variable names to them. The fuse then becomes completely independent of the application or context in which it operates, allowing it to be easily reused. The form code looks like this:

<form action="index.cfm?fuseaction=#XFA. submitForm#" method="post">
The value of XFA.submitForm is then set (by the architect) in the new FBX_ Switch.cfm file.
<cfcase value="showContestForm"> <cfset XFA.submitForm = "saveToDatabase"> <cfinclude template="qry_SaveContestEntry.cfm"> </cfcase>
Introducing XML Fusedocs
As programmers, we know that we should document our code, but we often create little or no documentation or, at best, documentation is done afterwards. At some firms documentation is taken much more seriously, but often the reason for that documentation is not conveyed. Without knowing why we should do something, how we should do it will never be clear. About the only thing that everyone seems to agree on is that documentation is something that's good for you, like castor oil. That was the old way.

Fusedoc is different. It's not about documenting your code; it's about coding your documentation. The Fusedoc process makes the application architect responsible for documenting the application before coding even starts. Fusedoc supplies all the information the coder needs to complete the fuse.

Fusedoc details exactly what the fuse is expected to do, and the variables and resources it uses and produces (inputs and outputs). It takes the form of a comment at the top of the fuse file.

<!--- <fusedoc fuse="fuse_name" version="2.0" language="ColdFusion"> fusedoc elements go hereŠ </fusedoc> --->
In Fusebox 2.0, Fusedocs used a proprietary format that I developed. Starting with Fusebox 3.0, they're now XML-based. If you're familiar with XML, reading a Fusedoc is simple. If you're new to XML, you may find the Fusedoc to be a great confidence builder toward working more with XML.

We're trying to provide enough information so that a competent programmer, who knows nothing of the application nor of the underlying database, can write the code. It's sometimes referred to as programming by contract because the comments provided form a sort of "work order" that tells the coder exactly what to do. The "contract" promises the programmer, "You fulfill this work order and you will be done with the code. You have no responsibility beyond what the document tells you."

With Fusebox 3, Fusedoc goes from a proprietary symbology to the open standard of XML. There's a document type definition (DTD) available at www.halhelms.com that provides the formal specification for Fusedoc. To give you a taste of what one looks like, Listing 1 provides a complete Fusedoc for a fuse, act_ValidateLogin.cfm.

More information on Fusedocs and Fusebox 3.0 is available at www.halhelms. com.

Nesting Circuits and Layouts
In Fusebox 2, integration between separate fuseboxes consisted mainly of "tricks" for sending a browser from one insular fusebox to another. But the true goal is a "drag-and-drop" type of functionality, in which a fusebox consists of one of more circuits (a file directory), all of which can access each other without direct dependence on the underlying directory structure and that, when done, can be dragged-and-dropped to another fusebox, requiring only a few small settings to be changed to the definition of the circuits.

If this type of nesting is combined with some sort of a standard with respect to how a fusebox operates within its own framework, we're able to write large amounts of reusable code. If we continue to adhere strictly to a standard for doing that, like Fusebox 3.0, then people can write entire applications that can be stamped as "Fusebox 3.0-compliant" and then dropped into our own code, saving time and money.

Fusebox 3.0 has its own concept of inheritance that, while very different from object-oriented languages, allows children to inherit properties from their parent, grandparent, and so on. Each of these circuits can be "dragged-and-dropped" into a parent circuit, resembling those wooden Russian dolls in which one doll contains another one. This pattern continues for as long as the artistry of the maker can sustain itself. In Fusebox 3.0 the grandparent circuit may contain one or more parent circuits that may contain one or more child circuits, and so on.

Each circuit, from the top or home circuit and continuing down each intervening circuit to the target circuit, has a settings file called FBX_Settings.cfm. The more global an item in a settings file is, the "higher up" the circuits tree that item would be loaded. So if your application accesses a data source called customers, you may want to set Request.DSN in the home circuit.

Suppose you dropped in a shopping cart circuit that needs a products data source. It might set one as part of its own settings file since that DSN may only be needed by that circuit or one of its child circuits. Of course you, as the architect of your program, can determine whether you want to force it to have a certain value by using cfset or whether you want it to inherit a value from a higher-level circuit - if such a value has already been set - by using a cfparam. In earlier versions of Fusebox, you included the app_globals.cfm once and then used app_locals.cfm for all second-tier circuits. In Fusebox 3.0 there's no hard meaning to "global" or "local" - anything set in a circuit is available to all circuits nested beneath that circuit. Again, remember the Russian doll.

Fusebox automatically reads in any FBX_Settings.cfm files from all circuits in the fuseaction path. Once the target circuit is reached, FBX_Switch.cfm is called, executing the target fuseaction within that circuit. This concept has not changed from Fusebox 1.0.

The concept of nested layouts is a very exciting addition. Having walked "down" the fuseaction circuit tree and executed the fuseaction, Fusebox now walks "up" the tree from the bottom "target" circuit where the fuseaction was found, up through each parent circuit up to the home circuit. Each of those circuits, in order, will have the opportunity to apply its own layout as determined by the FBX_Layouts file, just as you might put a Russian doll back together - each of the larger dolls taking what they got from the smaller doll and wrapping their own wrapper around it. While you can make use of every circuit in the fuseaction path, you don't need to. Figure 3 is a teaching example that shows the use of layouts at each circuit in the fuseaction path.

Migrating from Fusebox 2 to Fusebox 3
The learning curve for FB3 has been made easy due primarily to the standardization of the underlying core Fusebox code combined with a standardization in the naming convention. For these same reasons your migration path from FB2 to FB3 will be fairly easy, especially after you've achieved your first application with the new standard.

What about some of the underlying files you've dealt with before? Well, app_locals.cfm and app_globals.cfm are now combined into a single file called FBX_Settings.cfm. Application.cfm is still not a required file since the functionality you might put there can be put into FBX_Settings.cfm as well.

If you were a fan of Steve Nelson's <cf_bodycontent> custom tag for "wrapping" layout with common design elements, that functionality is still there too. Now, though, you don't need a "header" and a "footer" file, rather you can define actual layout files that include both header and footer elements in a way that's fairly transparent. Again, the "frozen" core fusebox file will pick up your layout files as well.

In Fusebox 2, index.cfm (or the default document) had all the core functionality of Fusebox written into it. In Fusebox 3.0 a new file, FBX_Fusebox30_CFxx.cfm - where xx is a version that's appropriate for the version of the ColdFusion application server your machine is running - takes its place.

Circuits are a new idea for the standard, one that entirely replaces Fusebox 2's ad hoc "dot-dot-slash" method of making one fusebox talk to another. With Fusebox 2 a fuseaction usually had a verb-noun phrase syntax, such as addItem ToCart. In Fusebox 3, fuseactions are written with a circuit_ alias.fuseaction syntax. To solve the problem of circuits on different levels having the same name, an FBX_Circuits.cfm file has been introduced. It maps individual circuits to an alias of your choosing. Nesting/inheritance in Fusebox 3.0 is done for you automatically by the core fusebox file, FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm, using the FBX_ Circuits.cfm file's mappings. Assume that we have an application with the circuit structure shown in Figure 4.

Assume that a fuse within the Granddaughter circuit executes this code:

<cflocation url="#self#?fuseaction=#XFA. continue#" addtoken="yes">
The variable, self, is defined in the home circuit's FBX_ Settings.cfm as index.cfm (or default file) of the home circuit - Grandmother, in our case. In addition the variable XFA.continue is defined within FBX_Switch.cfm as Grandson.sayHello. All of this is under the control of the application architect.

All action returns to the home circuit's default file. This file includes the version of FBX_Fusebox30_CFxx.cfm that's appropriate for the ColdFusion server that's running. Within this file Fusebox translates the fuseaction, Grandson.sayHello, to the fuseaction path, in effect saying, "You said Grandson.sayHello, but I see from FBX_Circuits.cfm that what you really mean is Grandmother/Father/Son/Grandson.sayHello. Let me execute that for you." All that's required from you is that you properly map the circuits in FBX_Circuits.cfm, a very easy matter, and use the compound circuit_alias.fuseaction syntax.

Going Forward...
Fusebox 3.0 represents a major landmark in the Fusebox community's approach to creating a methodology that consistently produces predictable success in Web application development, but it is just that - a landmark, a waystation in an ongoing journey. Fusebox began with ColdFusion and is being adopted by developers working in PHP, ASP, and JSP.

Where do we go from here? Much work remains to be done. With Fusebox 3.0 we've achieved a platform on which we can build even more firmly. In the coming months new work will begin on making ColdFusion even better. We hope that you'll be a part of this venture.

How can you be involved? First, join the Fusebox community officially by signing up at www.fusebox.org. Next, join the Fusebox mailing list; a signup form is available at www.halhelms.com. If you'd like to participate in making the future of Fusebox, sign up for the Fusebox steering mailing list by sending an e-mail to [email protected].

To learn more about being a contract "Fusecoder," check out Steve Nelson's Web site at www.secretagents.com. Lee Borkman is heading up an open-source effort to make wireframes even better; information is available at www.bjork.net. Jeff Peters has some wonderful tools available for Fusecoders at www.grokfusebox.com. John Quarto-vonTivadar has articles available at www.grokdotcom.com (free newsletter signup) and www.johnquarto.com. Finally, you may want to sign up for my free Occasional Newsletter at www.halhelms.com..

Alan Kay, the creator of the language Smalltalk, once said, "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." Let's get busy.

More Stories By Hal Helms

Hal Helms is a well-known speaker/writer/strategist on software development issues. He holds training sessions on Java, ColdFusion, and software development processes. He authors a popular monthly newsletter series. For more information, contact him at hal (at) halhelms.com or see his website, www.halhelms.com.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
The true value of the Internet of Things (IoT) lies not just in the data, but through the services that protect the data, perform the analysis and present findings in a usable way. With many IoT elements rooted in traditional IT components, Big Data and IoT isn’t just a play for enterprise. In fact, the IoT presents SMBs with the prospect of launching entirely new activities and exploring innovative areas. CompTIA research identifies several areas where IoT is expected to have the greatest impact.
Wearable devices have come of age. The primary applications of wearables so far have been "the Quantified Self" or the tracking of one's fitness and health status. We propose the evolution of wearables into social and emotional communication devices. Our BE(tm) sensor uses light to visualize the skin conductance response. Our sensors are very inexpensive and can be massively distributed to audiences or groups of any size, in order to gauge reactions to performances, video, or any kind of presentation. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Jocelyn Scheirer, CEO & Founder of Bionolux, will discuss ho...
Roberto Medrano, Executive Vice President at SOA Software, had reached 30,000 page views on his home page - http://RobertoMedrano.SYS-CON.com/ - on the SYS-CON family of online magazines, which includes Cloud Computing Journal, Internet of Things Journal, Big Data Journal, and SOA World Magazine. He is a recognized executive in the information technology fields of SOA, internet security, governance, and compliance. He has extensive experience with both start-ups and large companies, having been involved at the beginning of four IT industries: EDA, Open Systems, Computer Security and now SOA.
The industrial software market has treated data with the mentality of “collect everything now, worry about how to use it later.” We now find ourselves buried in data, with the pervasive connectivity of the (Industrial) Internet of Things only piling on more numbers. There’s too much data and not enough information. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Bob Gates, Global Marketing Director, GE’s Intelligent Platforms business, to discuss how realizing the power of IoT, software developers are now focused on understanding how industrial data can create intelligence for industrial operations. Imagine ...
Operational Hadoop and the Lambda Architecture for Streaming Data Apache Hadoop is emerging as a distributed platform for handling large and fast incoming streams of data. Predictive maintenance, supply chain optimization, and Internet-of-Things analysis are examples where Hadoop provides the scalable storage, processing, and analytics platform to gain meaningful insights from granular data that is typically only valuable from a large-scale, aggregate view. One architecture useful for capturing and analyzing streaming data is the Lambda Architecture, representing a model of how to analyze rea...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Vitria Technology, Inc. will exhibit at SYS-CON’s @ThingsExpo, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Vitria will showcase the company’s new IoT Analytics Platform through live demonstrations at booth #330. Vitria’s IoT Analytics Platform, fully integrated and powered by an operational intelligence engine, enables customers to rapidly build and operationalize advanced analytics to deliver timely business outcomes for use cases across the industrial, enterprise, and consumer segments.
The explosion of connected devices / sensors is creating an ever-expanding set of new and valuable data. In parallel the emerging capability of Big Data technologies to store, access, analyze, and react to this data is producing changes in business models under the umbrella of the Internet of Things (IoT). In particular within the Insurance industry, IoT appears positioned to enable deep changes by altering relationships between insurers, distributors, and the insured. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Michael Sick, a Senior Manager and Big Data Architect within Ernst and Young's Financial Servi...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Open Data Centers (ODC), a carrier-neutral colocation provider, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Open Data Centers is a carrier-neutral data center operator in New Jersey and New York City offering alternative connectivity options for carriers, service providers and enterprise customers.
The explosion of connected devices / sensors is creating an ever-expanding set of new and valuable data. In parallel the emerging capability of Big Data technologies to store, access, analyze, and react to this data is producing changes in business models under the umbrella of the Internet of Things (IoT). In particular within the Insurance industry, IoT appears positioned to enable deep changes by altering relationships between insurers, distributors, and the insured. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Michael Sick, a Senior Manager and Big Data Architect within Ernst and Young's Financial Servi...
PubNub on Monday has announced that it is partnering with IBM to bring its sophisticated real-time data streaming and messaging capabilities to Bluemix, IBM’s cloud development platform. “Today’s app and connected devices require an always-on connection, but building a secure, scalable solution from the ground up is time consuming, resource intensive, and error-prone,” said Todd Greene, CEO of PubNub. “PubNub enables web, mobile and IoT developers building apps on IBM Bluemix to quickly add scalable realtime functionality with minimal effort and cost.”
Sensor-enabled things are becoming more commonplace, precursors to a larger and more complex framework that most consider the ultimate promise of the IoT: things connecting, interacting, sharing, storing, and over time perhaps learning and predicting based on habits, behaviors, location, preferences, purchases and more. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Tom Wesselman, Director of Communications Ecosystem Architecture at Plantronics, will examine the still nascent IoT as it is coalescing, including what it is today, what it might ultimately be, the role of wearable tech, and technology gaps stil...
In the consumer IoT, everything is new, and the IT world of bits and bytes holds sway. But industrial and commercial realms encompass operational technology (OT) that has been around for 25 or 50 years. This grittier, pre-IP, more hands-on world has much to gain from Industrial IoT (IIoT) applications and principles. But adding sensors and wireless connectivity won’t work in environments that demand unwavering reliability and performance. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ron Sege, CEO of Echelon, will discuss how as enterprise IT embraces other IoT-related technology trends, enterprises with i...
When it comes to the Internet of Things, hooking up will get you only so far. If you want customers to commit, you need to go beyond simply connecting products. You need to use the devices themselves to transform how you engage with every customer and how you manage the entire product lifecycle. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sean Lorenz, Technical Product Manager for Xively at LogMeIn, will show how “product relationship management” can help you leverage your connected devices and the data they generate about customer usage and product performance to deliver extremely compelling and reliabl...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is causing data centers to become radically decentralized and atomized within a new paradigm known as “fog computing.” To support IoT applications, such as connected cars and smart grids, data centers' core functions will be decentralized out to the network's edges and endpoints (aka “fogs”). As this trend takes hold, Big Data analytics platforms will focus on high-volume log analysis (aka “logs”) and rely heavily on cognitive-computing algorithms (aka “cogs”) to make sense of it all.
With several hundred implementations of IoT-enabled solutions in the past 12 months alone, this session will focus on experience over the art of the possible. Many can only imagine the most advanced telematics platform ever deployed, supporting millions of customers, producing tens of thousands events or GBs per trip, and hundreds of TBs per month. With the ability to support a billion sensor events per second, over 30PB of warm data for analytics, and hundreds of PBs for an data analytics archive, in his session at @ThingsExpo, Jim Kaskade, Vice President and General Manager, Big Data & Ana...
One of the biggest impacts of the Internet of Things is and will continue to be on data; specifically data volume, management and usage. Companies are scrambling to adapt to this new and unpredictable data reality with legacy infrastructure that cannot handle the speed and volume of data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Don DeLoach, CEO and president of Infobright, will discuss how companies need to rethink their data infrastructure to participate in the IoT, including: Data storage: Understanding the kinds of data: structured, unstructured, big/small? Analytics: What kinds and how responsiv...
Since 2008 and for the first time in history, more than half of humans live in urban areas, urging cities to become “smart.” Today, cities can leverage the wide availability of smartphones combined with new technologies such as Beacons or NFC to connect their urban furniture and environment to create citizen-first services that improve transportation, way-finding and information delivery. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Laetitia Gazel-Anthoine, CEO of Connecthings, will focus on successful use cases.
Sensor-enabled things are becoming more commonplace, precursors to a larger and more complex framework that most consider the ultimate promise of the IoT: things connecting, interacting, sharing, storing, and over time perhaps learning and predicting based on habits, behaviors, location, preferences, purchases and more. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Tom Wesselman, Director of Communications Ecosystem Architecture at Plantronics, will examine the still nascent IoT as it is coalescing, including what it is today, what it might ultimately be, the role of wearable tech, and technology gaps stil...
SYS-CON Events announced today that GENBAND, a leading developer of real time communications software solutions, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's WebRTC Summit, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. The GENBAND team will be on hand to demonstrate their newest product, Kandy. Kandy is a communications Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables companies to seamlessly integrate more human communications into their Web and mobile applications - creating more engaging experiences for their customers and boosting collaboration and productiv...
From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, shared some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, deploy, and manage applications integrating voice, video and data. He is the co-founder of TeleStax, a...