|By Hal Helms||
|November 1, 2001 12:00 AM EST||
Someone once said that people should never see how laws or sausages are made. I think I can safely add technical standards to that list. There have been passionate arguments and some painful missteps along the way, but that's all eclipsed as people begin discovering the new power and ease-of-use in Fusebox 3.0.
What's New in Fusebox 3.0
Here's a rundown of some of the key features:
- A nested model for communication between circuits created to make reuse and distributed development easier
- A nested layout model that opens up possibilities for highly dynamic, flexible layouts
- XML-based Fusedoc providing both PDL (Program Definition Language) and documentation for fuses
- A stable set of key files that forms a Fusebox skeleton, making the learning process easier for people new to Fusebox and making it much easier to generate a new Fusebox application
- Exit fuseactions (XFAs) for greater reusability of fuses and circuits
- An API that exposes key variables within a Fusebox structure defined by the key Fusebox file
The core Fusebox files begin with an FBX_ prefix. A sample application is assumed with the circuit structure shown in Figure 1.
The component Fusebox files are:
This file is optional and is used to set variables that are needed by the application. Each circuit may have its own FBX_Settings.cfm file. If a fuseaction such as grandchild.main is resolved to home/parent/ child/grandchild.main, FBX_ Settings.cfm will be called in each directory in order. This allows you to set general variables at higher levels and override them, if needed, in child directories. This file replaces myGlobals.cfm, app_ Globals.cfm, and app_Locals.cfm.
Required in the home circuit, FBX_ Circuits.cfm maps circuit aliases to physical paths. In the sample application shown, the contents of FBX_Circuits.cfm are:
Fusebox.Circuits.home = 'Grandparent';
Fusebox.Circuits.parent = 'Grandparent/Parent';
Fusebox.Circuits.Child = 'Grandparent/Parent/Child';
Fusebox.Circuits.grandchild = 'Grandparent/Parent/Child/Grandchild';
The circuit alias is a key within a structure called Circuits, with the reserved structure Fusebox. The circuit alias doesn't have to be the same name as the physical directory, as shown by aliasing the top directory (Grandparent) as home. This allows for directories at different levels to have the same name.
This file is placed in every circuit that handles fuseactions; FBX_Switch.cfm is a <cfswitch> statement with <cfcase>s for every fuseaction the individual circuit is to handle.
Required in any circuit that implements a separate layout file, FBX_Layouts.cfm is responsible for setting the variables, Fusebox.layoutDir and Fusebox.layoutFile. The layout file pointed to in Fusebox.layoutFile must, at a minimum, output Fusebox.layout. Conditional processing is possible within FBX_Layouts.cfm. If, for example, a child sets a Boolean variable called QueryReturnedRecords, a parent might implement this simple logic in FBX_Layouts.cfm:
Used if the ColdFusion server version is below version 5.0, this file is the widely popular <cf_bodycontent> tag.
Of the files FBX_Fusebox30_CF50.cfm, FBX_Fusebox30_CF45.cfm, and FBX_Fusebox30_CF40.cfm, only one will be called in index.cfm, depending on which version of ColdFusion server is running. The index.cfm file should have this code in it:
<cfif Val(ListGetAt(Server.ColdFusion.ProductVersion, 1)) LT "5">
<cfif Val(ListGetAt(Server.ColdFusion.ProductVersion, 2)) is "5">
<cfinclude template="fbx_fusebox30 _CF45.cfm">
<cfinclude template="fbx_fusebox30_ CF40.cfm">
Note: If you create circuit applications, the only file that's absolutely required for a circuit that only runs beneath other circuits is the fbx_switch.cfm file. The other files are needed only if you have special settings to set and special layouts to handle. Circuits are defined only in the home circuit. Of course, you do have to supply your own fuseactions and fuses; we had to leave some of the work for you, after all!
In addition to the core Fusebox files, DefaultLayout.cfm is provided. This file simply outputs Fusebox.layout. This is a useful file when you don't care about a given circuit adding any layouts and simply want it to display the layout. Note, however, that while the fuseaction path must have one layout file, you don't need any files in circuits that don't have any special layout requirements. In the "family" application whose directory structure is shown in Figure 1, a request for grandchild.main might, for example, have layout handled in only one of the circuits involved. In such a case the other circuits wouldn't require an FBX_Layouts.cfm file nor the use of DefaultLayout.cfm.
Reserved Variables: The Fusebox 3.0 API
There are two complex variable structures. The first, the FB_ structure, is used for internal calculations by the FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm file. You should neither read nor write to this structure since it will immediately render your code non-Fusebox 3.0-compliant and may well break your application.
The second reserved variable structure is the public "API" called Fusebox (see Table 1). Again, you shouldn't make any changes to this API. You'll find some variables within this structure very useful. You can use these public variables anywhere within your code, as any changes to the Fusebox standard will support these variables going forward, even if the underlying code that calculates these variables is modified.
Core Fusebox 3.0 Concepts
With the new terminology, API, and required files under our belts, let's turn our attention to the latest additions to the "core Fusebox" methodology that makes its appearance in Fusebox 3.0. These are exit fuseactions (XFAs), Fusedocs, and nested circuits.
XFAs address issues of severability and reuse; Fusedocs address code documentation, especially in a distributed developer environment; nested circuits address inheritance, layouts, and exception handling. Although these are largely separate concepts, they do weave into the overall Fusebox scheme and are absolutely essential toward realizing the advantages that Fusebox 3 can deliver.
Exit Fuseactions (XFAs)
The first of the new concepts for Fusebox 3.0 is exit fuseactions. XFAs are the identified exit points of a particular fuse. In Fusebox the meaning of an exit point is not "Where do we go next?" (we always go back to the fusebox!), but rather, "What fuseaction are we going to take upon our return to the fusebox?"
For example, take the case where a user fills out a form to win the $1 million we're giving away. The user begins by getting an exciting, unexpected e-mail from us (really, it's not spam!) on which appears a link (see Figure 2):
<a href="http://scamsRus.com/index.cfm? fuseaction=showContestForm">Click here to win a million dollars</a>
When the user submits that form, we want to store the information to a database while the user expectantly awaits a celebrity spokesperson's arrival with a substantial cashier's check. Regardless of what the spokesperson does, the form had only one possible way to return to the fusebox - by the user clicking the OK button. We might assign an exit fuseaction of "saveToDatabase" to that exit point, and represent it like this:
The problem with such a fuseaction is that it's a hard reference. To reuse the fuse - either in a new application or in a new context in the same application - I need to either change code or introduce conditional logic into the fuse. Neither path is optimal.
A much better way to handle our sample case is to identify the exit points of a fuse - those paths out of the fuse - and to assign variable names to them. The fuse then becomes completely independent of the application or context in which it operates, allowing it to be easily reused. The form code looks like this:
The value of XFA.submitForm is then set (by the architect) in the new FBX_ Switch.cfm file.
<cfset XFA.submitForm = "saveToDatabase">
Introducing XML Fusedocs
As programmers, we know that we should document our code, but we often create little or no documentation or, at best, documentation is done afterwards. At some firms documentation is taken much more seriously, but often the reason for that documentation is not conveyed. Without knowing why we should do something, how we should do it will never be clear. About the only thing that everyone seems to agree on is that documentation is something that's good for you, like castor oil. That was the old way.
Fusedoc is different. It's not about documenting your code; it's about coding your documentation. The Fusedoc process makes the application architect responsible for documenting the application before coding even starts. Fusedoc supplies all the information the coder needs to complete the fuse.
Fusedoc details exactly what the fuse is expected to do, and the variables and resources it uses and produces (inputs and outputs). It takes the form of a comment at the top of the fuse file.
<fusedoc fuse="fuse_name" version="2.0" language="ColdFusion">
fusedoc elements go hereŠ
In Fusebox 2.0, Fusedocs used a proprietary format that I developed. Starting with Fusebox 3.0, they're now XML-based. If you're familiar with XML, reading a Fusedoc is simple. If you're new to XML, you may find the Fusedoc to be a great confidence builder toward working more with XML.
We're trying to provide enough information so that a competent programmer, who knows nothing of the application nor of the underlying database, can write the code. It's sometimes referred to as programming by contract because the comments provided form a sort of "work order" that tells the coder exactly what to do. The "contract" promises the programmer, "You fulfill this work order and you will be done with the code. You have no responsibility beyond what the document tells you."
With Fusebox 3, Fusedoc goes from a proprietary symbology to the open standard of XML. There's a document type definition (DTD) available at www.halhelms.com that provides the formal specification for Fusedoc. To give you a taste of what one looks like, Listing 1 provides a complete Fusedoc for a fuse, act_ValidateLogin.cfm.
More information on Fusedocs and Fusebox 3.0 is available at www.halhelms. com.
Nesting Circuits and Layouts
In Fusebox 2, integration between separate fuseboxes consisted mainly of "tricks" for sending a browser from one insular fusebox to another. But the true goal is a "drag-and-drop" type of functionality, in which a fusebox consists of one of more circuits (a file directory), all of which can access each other without direct dependence on the underlying directory structure and that, when done, can be dragged-and-dropped to another fusebox, requiring only a few small settings to be changed to the definition of the circuits.
If this type of nesting is combined with some sort of a standard with respect to how a fusebox operates within its own framework, we're able to write large amounts of reusable code. If we continue to adhere strictly to a standard for doing that, like Fusebox 3.0, then people can write entire applications that can be stamped as "Fusebox 3.0-compliant" and then dropped into our own code, saving time and money.
Fusebox 3.0 has its own concept of inheritance that, while very different from object-oriented languages, allows children to inherit properties from their parent, grandparent, and so on. Each of these circuits can be "dragged-and-dropped" into a parent circuit, resembling those wooden Russian dolls in which one doll contains another one. This pattern continues for as long as the artistry of the maker can sustain itself. In Fusebox 3.0 the grandparent circuit may contain one or more parent circuits that may contain one or more child circuits, and so on.
Each circuit, from the top or home circuit and continuing down each intervening circuit to the target circuit, has a settings file called FBX_Settings.cfm. The more global an item in a settings file is, the "higher up" the circuits tree that item would be loaded. So if your application accesses a data source called customers, you may want to set Request.DSN in the home circuit.
Suppose you dropped in a shopping cart circuit that needs a products data source. It might set one as part of its own settings file since that DSN may only be needed by that circuit or one of its child circuits. Of course you, as the architect of your program, can determine whether you want to force it to have a certain value by using cfset or whether you want it to inherit a value from a higher-level circuit - if such a value has already been set - by using a cfparam. In earlier versions of Fusebox, you included the app_globals.cfm once and then used app_locals.cfm for all second-tier circuits. In Fusebox 3.0 there's no hard meaning to "global" or "local" - anything set in a circuit is available to all circuits nested beneath that circuit. Again, remember the Russian doll.
Fusebox automatically reads in any FBX_Settings.cfm files from all circuits in the fuseaction path. Once the target circuit is reached, FBX_Switch.cfm is called, executing the target fuseaction within that circuit. This concept has not changed from Fusebox 1.0.
The concept of nested layouts is a very exciting addition. Having walked "down" the fuseaction circuit tree and executed the fuseaction, Fusebox now walks "up" the tree from the bottom "target" circuit where the fuseaction was found, up through each parent circuit up to the home circuit. Each of those circuits, in order, will have the opportunity to apply its own layout as determined by the FBX_Layouts file, just as you might put a Russian doll back together - each of the larger dolls taking what they got from the smaller doll and wrapping their own wrapper around it. While you can make use of every circuit in the fuseaction path, you don't need to. Figure 3 is a teaching example that shows the use of layouts at each circuit in the fuseaction path.
Migrating from Fusebox 2 to Fusebox 3
The learning curve for FB3 has been made easy due primarily to the standardization of the underlying core Fusebox code combined with a standardization in the naming convention. For these same reasons your migration path from FB2 to FB3 will be fairly easy, especially after you've achieved your first application with the new standard.
What about some of the underlying files you've dealt with before? Well, app_locals.cfm and app_globals.cfm are now combined into a single file called FBX_Settings.cfm. Application.cfm is still not a required file since the functionality you might put there can be put into FBX_Settings.cfm as well.
If you were a fan of Steve Nelson's <cf_bodycontent> custom tag for "wrapping" layout with common design elements, that functionality is still there too. Now, though, you don't need a "header" and a "footer" file, rather you can define actual layout files that include both header and footer elements in a way that's fairly transparent. Again, the "frozen" core fusebox file will pick up your layout files as well.
In Fusebox 2, index.cfm (or the default document) had all the core functionality of Fusebox written into it. In Fusebox 3.0 a new file, FBX_Fusebox30_CFxx.cfm - where xx is a version that's appropriate for the version of the ColdFusion application server your machine is running - takes its place.
Circuits are a new idea for the standard, one that entirely replaces Fusebox 2's ad hoc "dot-dot-slash" method of making one fusebox talk to another. With Fusebox 2 a fuseaction usually had a verb-noun phrase syntax, such as addItem ToCart. In Fusebox 3, fuseactions are written with a circuit_ alias.fuseaction syntax. To solve the problem of circuits on different levels having the same name, an FBX_Circuits.cfm file has been introduced. It maps individual circuits to an alias of your choosing. Nesting/inheritance in Fusebox 3.0 is done for you automatically by the core fusebox file, FBX_Fusebox_CFxx.cfm, using the FBX_ Circuits.cfm file's mappings. Assume that we have an application with the circuit structure shown in Figure 4.
Assume that a fuse within the Granddaughter circuit executes this code:
The variable, self, is defined in the home circuit's FBX_ Settings.cfm as index.cfm (or default file) of the home circuit - Grandmother, in our case. In addition the variable XFA.continue is defined within FBX_Switch.cfm as Grandson.sayHello. All of this is under the control of the application architect.
All action returns to the home circuit's default file. This file includes the version of FBX_Fusebox30_CFxx.cfm that's appropriate for the ColdFusion server that's running. Within this file Fusebox translates the fuseaction, Grandson.sayHello, to the fuseaction path, in effect saying, "You said Grandson.sayHello, but I see from FBX_Circuits.cfm that what you really mean is Grandmother/Father/Son/Grandson.sayHello. Let me execute that for you." All that's required from you is that you properly map the circuits in FBX_Circuits.cfm, a very easy matter, and use the compound circuit_alias.fuseaction syntax.
Fusebox 3.0 represents a major landmark in the Fusebox community's approach to creating a methodology that consistently produces predictable success in Web application development, but it is just that - a landmark, a waystation in an ongoing journey. Fusebox began with ColdFusion and is being adopted by developers working in PHP, ASP, and JSP.
Where do we go from here? Much work remains to be done. With Fusebox 3.0 we've achieved a platform on which we can build even more firmly. In the coming months new work will begin on making ColdFusion even better. We hope that you'll be a part of this venture.
How can you be involved? First, join the Fusebox community officially by signing up at www.fusebox.org. Next, join the Fusebox mailing list; a signup form is available at www.halhelms.com. If you'd like to participate in making the future of Fusebox, sign up for the Fusebox steering mailing list by sending an e-mail to [email protected].
To learn more about being a contract "Fusecoder," check out Steve Nelson's Web site at www.secretagents.com. Lee Borkman is heading up an open-source effort to make wireframes even better; information is available at www.bjork.net. Jeff Peters has some wonderful tools available for Fusecoders at www.grokfusebox.com. John Quarto-vonTivadar has articles available at www.grokdotcom.com (free newsletter signup) and www.johnquarto.com. Finally, you may want to sign up for my free Occasional Newsletter at www.halhelms.com..
Alan Kay, the creator of the language Smalltalk, once said, "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." Let's get busy.
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
Nov. 27, 2015 07:45 AM EST Reads: 416
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
Nov. 27, 2015 07:30 AM EST Reads: 310
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Nov. 27, 2015 04:15 AM EST Reads: 706
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
Nov. 27, 2015 04:00 AM EST Reads: 217
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Nov. 27, 2015 04:00 AM EST Reads: 327
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Nov. 27, 2015 02:30 AM EST Reads: 451
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
Nov. 27, 2015 02:00 AM EST Reads: 517
The cloud. Like a comic book superhero, there seems to be no problem it can’t fix or cost it can’t slash. Yet making the transition is not always easy and production environments are still largely on premise. Taking some practical and sensible steps to reduce risk can also help provide a basis for a successful cloud transition. A plethora of surveys from the likes of IDG and Gartner show that more than 70 percent of enterprises have deployed at least one or more cloud application or workload. Yet a closer inspection at the data reveals less than half of these cloud projects involve production...
Nov. 27, 2015 01:00 AM EST Reads: 460
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
Nov. 27, 2015 01:00 AM EST Reads: 423
Growth hacking is common for startups to make unheard-of progress in building their business. Career Hacks can help Geek Girls and those who support them (yes, that's you too, Dad!) to excel in this typically male-dominated world. Get ready to learn the facts: Is there a bias against women in the tech / developer communities? Why are women 50% of the workforce, but hold only 24% of the STEM or IT positions? Some beginnings of what to do about it! In her Day 2 Keynote at 17th Cloud Expo, Sandy Carter, IBM General Manager Cloud Ecosystem and Developers, and a Social Business Evangelist, wil...
Nov. 27, 2015 01:00 AM EST Reads: 559
PubNub has announced the release of BLOCKS, a set of customizable microservices that give developers a simple way to add code and deploy features for realtime apps.PubNub BLOCKS executes business logic directly on the data streaming through PubNub’s network without splitting it off to an intermediary server controlled by the customer. This revolutionary approach streamlines app development, reduces endpoint-to-endpoint latency, and allows apps to better leverage the enormous scalability of PubNub’s Data Stream Network.
Nov. 27, 2015 01:00 AM EST Reads: 309
Apps and devices shouldn't stop working when there's limited or no network connectivity. Learn how to bring data stored in a cloud database to the edge of the network (and back again) whenever an Internet connection is available. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Ben Perlmutter, a Sales Engineer with IBM Cloudant, demonstrated techniques for replicating cloud databases with devices in order to build offline-first mobile or Internet of Things (IoT) apps that can provide a better, faster user experience, both offline and online. The focus of this talk was on IBM Cloudant, Apache CouchDB, and ...
Nov. 27, 2015 12:45 AM EST Reads: 394
Container technology is shaping the future of DevOps and it’s also changing the way organizations think about application development. With the rise of mobile applications in the enterprise, businesses are abandoning year-long development cycles and embracing technologies that enable rapid development and continuous deployment of apps. In his session at DevOps Summit, Kurt Collins, Developer Evangelist at Built.io, examined how Docker has evolved into a highly effective tool for application delivery by allowing increasingly popular Mobile Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS) platforms to quickly crea...
Nov. 27, 2015 12:00 AM EST Reads: 337
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Nov. 26, 2015 10:00 PM EST Reads: 400
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical to maintaining positive ROI. Raxak Protect is an automated security compliance SaaS platform and ma...
Nov. 26, 2015 04:00 PM EST Reads: 386
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 7-9, 2016 at Javits Center, New York City and Nov 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 18th International @CloudExpo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
Nov. 26, 2015 03:30 PM EST Reads: 527
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York and Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place Nov 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 17th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound cha...
Nov. 26, 2015 03:15 PM EST Reads: 526
We are rapidly moving to a brave new world of interconnected smart homes, cars, offices and factories known as the Internet of Things (IoT). Sensors and monitoring devices will touch every part of our lives. Let's take a closer look at the Internet of Things. The Internet of Things is a worldwide network of objects and devices connected to the Internet. They are electronics, sensors, software and more. These objects connect to the Internet and can be controlled remotely via apps and programs. Because they can be accessed via the Internet, these devices create a tremendous opportunity to inte...
Nov. 26, 2015 02:15 PM EST Reads: 502
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi’s VP Business Development and Engineering, explored the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driving this change including privacy controls, data transparency and integration of real time context with p...
Nov. 26, 2015 01:00 PM EST Reads: 394
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
Nov. 26, 2015 12:00 PM EST Reads: 153