Welcome!

ColdFusion Authors: Yakov Fain, Maureen O'Gara, Nancy Y. Nee, Tad Anderson, Daniel Kaar

Related Topics: ColdFusion

ColdFusion: Article

A Fusebox How-To

A Fusebox How-To

I recently received an inquiry from a developer about my Guru-on-Call service (www.TeamAllaire.com/hal). He requested help in identifying the fuses he would need for his application.

After reading my first two Fusebox articles in last year's CFDJ (Vol. 1, issues 3 and 4), he wrote, "I understand what you are explaining but implementing it is a little harder than I thought."

I wonder if others may be having this same problem - understanding the theory but a little hung up on the details. In this article I'm going to walk through developing a Fusebox application so you can see the theory put into reality. I'm assuming you've already read enough about the Fusebox methodology to understand how it works. If you need a refresher on this, check out the back issues of CFDJ online for the two articles I wrote with Steve Nelson and Gabe Roffman, or see the sidebar for a quick recap of Fusebox rules.

I find the hardest part of a large Web application is not the actual coding - thanks to Fusebox - but determining what the actual job requirements are. I'm not alone in this; it's a common complaint of developers. Over the years I've tried, in a variety of ways, to nail down customers so they wouldn't keep changing their minds. One day it occurred to me that the reason customers wouldn't stop making changes is because they couldn't. They couldn't tell me the "requirements" until they saw them reflected in the application.

If this is true, it's my job to make sure the users can see the application - and prod, poke and punch it - until they're sure that what they see is what they want. Only then do I begin the actual coding. I place great emphasis on a simulated application that looks like the real thing to the users. When they click buttons, things happen. Links are live. Forms accept inputs. And while it looks like a real application, it's a completely different matter under the hood. There's no database hooked up to the application. There are no persistent variables, perhaps no variables at all. Any use of code (CFML or otherwise) is there only to present a convincing simulation. We haven't begun coding yet; we're doing this because experience has shown that it's the only way to find out what kind of application we should build.

This methodology takes some of the stress off skilled programmers. In practice I find that over half the work required in developing an application can be done without involving programmers - a welcome discovery as they're hard to find. This prototype is handled by people skilled in interface design and graphical arts who create essentially static Web pages that mimic their real counterparts.

It's during this process that questions, comments and concerns surface. I needed a way to capture and contain this information in a central location where all those involved in the development of the application could communicate and contribute. Over time we've developed a method that effectively lets us define and refine what the application should be, do and look like.

This method relies on some ColdFusion code running alongside the designer's prototype work. Since designers typically aren't coders, we ask only that they save the Web files with a .cfm extension and append the following code onto each of these pages:

<cfinclude template="devnotes/index.cfm"> At runtime this code calls a small Fusebox application at the bottom of the page that produces something similar to Figure 1.

This allows us to preserve the history of the development of the application while providing a map for its continued evolution. I'm going to show you how I approached building this Fusebox-based mini-app, which I hope will make the process of creating a Fusebox application clearer than a mere reading of the rules.

I start off application development - even of small apps - by creating "use cases" to identify requirements for the application. These are natural language statements that require no technical background and are ideal for communicating between client and developer. At this point, use cases form the basis of our understanding of what the application should do. A sample use case might look like this:

"User should be able to log onto the system and be validated as either a user or administrator."

While use cases are wonderful for determining requirements for the application and for communicating with clients, they're too general to be of much use to developers. For this I rely on the skill of interface designers who understand how to translate the client's requirements into actual pages that show how they'll do it. This is the prototype I spoke of above. It's an iterative process; at each step we hopefully come closer to finding exactly what the client needs. Once all participants have agreed that the application is fully defined, we arrive at a prototype freeze. Now it's my job to match the use cases (as interpreted in the prototype) with one or more fuseactions.

Fuseactions, remember, define what the application is actively involved in; at any point there's only one fuseaction operating. A fuseaction is a request for action that's sent only to the fusebox (usually named index.cfm). It's fundamental to Fusebox that all requests for action go through the fusebox, not to individual fuses. Without this we're on a slippery slope where one fuse calls another and that fuse calls yet another until we end up with a tangled mess of intricate dependencies between fuses, defeating our goals of readability and reusability.

Once the request for action (the fuseaction) is sent to the fusebox, the fusebox calls on fuses to carry out the action. So the development process goes like this: use case ...> prototype ...> fuseaction(s) ...> fuse(s). By creating a table that shows the associations between use cases, fuses and fuseactions, I can see how complete my application architecture is. Table 1 is the table for this application.

As Dennis Miller says, "I don't want to get off on a rant here...," but let me say a word about naming fuses. The Fusebox.org site suggests naming prefixes for fuses based on the fuse's job: dsp_fusename for display-type fuses and so forth. I've heard heated debate over the "correct" naming scheme and I think this misses the key point - Fusebox is a development methodology, not a naming convention. My position is, if you find the naming scheme to be helpful, by all means use it. If you have another naming scheme - possibly already a standard within your company - then use that. The power of Fusebox doesn't depend on how a fuse is named, but on its clarity, conciseness and precision.

This method relies on some ColdFusion code running alongside the designer's prototype work. Since designers typically aren't coders, we ask only that they save the Web files with a .cfm extension and append the following code onto each of these pages:

<cfinclude template="devnotes/index.cfm">

At runtime this code calls a small Fusebox application at the bottom of the page that produces something similar to Figure 1.

This allows us to preserve the history of the development of the application while providing a map for its continued evolution. I'm going to show you how I approached building this Fusebox-based mini-app, which I hope will make the process of creating a Fusebox application clearer than a mere reading of the rules.

I start off application development - even of small apps - by creating "use cases" to identify requirements for the application. These are natural language statements that require no technical background and are ideal for communicating between client and developer. At this point, use cases form the basis of our understanding of what the application should do. A sample use case might look like this:

"User should be able to log onto the system and be validated as either a user or administrator."

While use cases are wonderful for determining requirements for the application and for communicating with clients, they're too general to be of much use to developers. For this I rely on the skill of interface designers who understand how to translate the client's requirements into actual pages that show how they'll do it. This is the prototype I spoke of above. It's an iterative process; at each step we hopefully come closer to finding exactly what the client needs. Once all participants have agreed that the application is fully defined, we arrive at a prototype freeze. Now it's my job to match the use cases (as interpreted in the prototype) with one or more fuseactions.

Fuseactions, remember, define what the application is actively involved in; at any point there's only one fuseaction operating. A fuseaction is a request for action that's sent only to the fusebox (usually named index.cfm). It's fundamental to Fusebox that all requests for action go through the fusebox, not to individual fuses. Without this we're on a slippery slope where one fuse calls another and that fuse calls yet another until we end up with a tangled mess of intricate dependencies between fuses, defeating our goals of readability and reusability.

Once the request for action (the fuseaction) is sent to the fusebox, the fusebox calls on fuses to carry out the action. So the development process goes like this: use case ...> prototype ...> fuseaction(s) ...> fuse(s). By creating a table that shows the associations between use cases, fuses and fuseactions, I can see how complete my application architecture is. Table 1 is the table for this application.

As Dennis Miller says, "I don't want to get off on a rant here...," but let me say a word about naming fuses. The Fusebox.org site suggests naming prefixes for fuses based on the fuse's job: dsp_fusename for display-type fuses and so forth. I've heard heated debate over the "correct" naming scheme and I think this misses the key point - Fusebox is a development methodology, not a naming convention. My position is, if you find the naming scheme to be helpful, by all means use it. If you have another naming scheme - possibly already a standard within your company - then use that. The power of Fusebox doesn't depend on how a fuse is named, but on its clarity, conciseness and precision.

More Stories By Hal Helms

Hal Helms is a well-known speaker/writer/strategist on software development issues. He holds training sessions on Java, ColdFusion, and software development processes. He authors a popular monthly newsletter series. For more information, contact him at hal (at) halhelms.com or see his website, www.halhelms.com.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.