Welcome!

You will be redirected in 30 seconds or close now.

ColdFusion Authors: Yakov Fain, Jeremy Geelan, Maureen O'Gara, Nancy Y. Nee, Tad Anderson

Related Topics: ColdFusion

ColdFusion: Article

A Fusebox How-To

A Fusebox How-To

I recently received an inquiry from a developer about my Guru-on-Call service (www.TeamAllaire.com/hal). He requested help in identifying the fuses he would need for his application.

After reading my first two Fusebox articles in last year's CFDJ (Vol. 1, issues 3 and 4), he wrote, "I understand what you are explaining but implementing it is a little harder than I thought."

I wonder if others may be having this same problem - understanding the theory but a little hung up on the details. In this article I'm going to walk through developing a Fusebox application so you can see the theory put into reality. I'm assuming you've already read enough about the Fusebox methodology to understand how it works. If you need a refresher on this, check out the back issues of CFDJ online for the two articles I wrote with Steve Nelson and Gabe Roffman, or see the sidebar for a quick recap of Fusebox rules.

I find the hardest part of a large Web application is not the actual coding - thanks to Fusebox - but determining what the actual job requirements are. I'm not alone in this; it's a common complaint of developers. Over the years I've tried, in a variety of ways, to nail down customers so they wouldn't keep changing their minds. One day it occurred to me that the reason customers wouldn't stop making changes is because they couldn't. They couldn't tell me the "requirements" until they saw them reflected in the application.

If this is true, it's my job to make sure the users can see the application - and prod, poke and punch it - until they're sure that what they see is what they want. Only then do I begin the actual coding. I place great emphasis on a simulated application that looks like the real thing to the users. When they click buttons, things happen. Links are live. Forms accept inputs. And while it looks like a real application, it's a completely different matter under the hood. There's no database hooked up to the application. There are no persistent variables, perhaps no variables at all. Any use of code (CFML or otherwise) is there only to present a convincing simulation. We haven't begun coding yet; we're doing this because experience has shown that it's the only way to find out what kind of application we should build.

This methodology takes some of the stress off skilled programmers. In practice I find that over half the work required in developing an application can be done without involving programmers - a welcome discovery as they're hard to find. This prototype is handled by people skilled in interface design and graphical arts who create essentially static Web pages that mimic their real counterparts.

It's during this process that questions, comments and concerns surface. I needed a way to capture and contain this information in a central location where all those involved in the development of the application could communicate and contribute. Over time we've developed a method that effectively lets us define and refine what the application should be, do and look like.

This method relies on some ColdFusion code running alongside the designer's prototype work. Since designers typically aren't coders, we ask only that they save the Web files with a .cfm extension and append the following code onto each of these pages:

<cfinclude template="devnotes/index.cfm"> At runtime this code calls a small Fusebox application at the bottom of the page that produces something similar to Figure 1.

This allows us to preserve the history of the development of the application while providing a map for its continued evolution. I'm going to show you how I approached building this Fusebox-based mini-app, which I hope will make the process of creating a Fusebox application clearer than a mere reading of the rules.

I start off application development - even of small apps - by creating "use cases" to identify requirements for the application. These are natural language statements that require no technical background and are ideal for communicating between client and developer. At this point, use cases form the basis of our understanding of what the application should do. A sample use case might look like this:

"User should be able to log onto the system and be validated as either a user or administrator."

While use cases are wonderful for determining requirements for the application and for communicating with clients, they're too general to be of much use to developers. For this I rely on the skill of interface designers who understand how to translate the client's requirements into actual pages that show how they'll do it. This is the prototype I spoke of above. It's an iterative process; at each step we hopefully come closer to finding exactly what the client needs. Once all participants have agreed that the application is fully defined, we arrive at a prototype freeze. Now it's my job to match the use cases (as interpreted in the prototype) with one or more fuseactions.

Fuseactions, remember, define what the application is actively involved in; at any point there's only one fuseaction operating. A fuseaction is a request for action that's sent only to the fusebox (usually named index.cfm). It's fundamental to Fusebox that all requests for action go through the fusebox, not to individual fuses. Without this we're on a slippery slope where one fuse calls another and that fuse calls yet another until we end up with a tangled mess of intricate dependencies between fuses, defeating our goals of readability and reusability.

Once the request for action (the fuseaction) is sent to the fusebox, the fusebox calls on fuses to carry out the action. So the development process goes like this: use case ...> prototype ...> fuseaction(s) ...> fuse(s). By creating a table that shows the associations between use cases, fuses and fuseactions, I can see how complete my application architecture is. Table 1 is the table for this application.

As Dennis Miller says, "I don't want to get off on a rant here...," but let me say a word about naming fuses. The Fusebox.org site suggests naming prefixes for fuses based on the fuse's job: dsp_fusename for display-type fuses and so forth. I've heard heated debate over the "correct" naming scheme and I think this misses the key point - Fusebox is a development methodology, not a naming convention. My position is, if you find the naming scheme to be helpful, by all means use it. If you have another naming scheme - possibly already a standard within your company - then use that. The power of Fusebox doesn't depend on how a fuse is named, but on its clarity, conciseness and precision.

This method relies on some ColdFusion code running alongside the designer's prototype work. Since designers typically aren't coders, we ask only that they save the Web files with a .cfm extension and append the following code onto each of these pages:

<cfinclude template="devnotes/index.cfm">

At runtime this code calls a small Fusebox application at the bottom of the page that produces something similar to Figure 1.

This allows us to preserve the history of the development of the application while providing a map for its continued evolution. I'm going to show you how I approached building this Fusebox-based mini-app, which I hope will make the process of creating a Fusebox application clearer than a mere reading of the rules.

I start off application development - even of small apps - by creating "use cases" to identify requirements for the application. These are natural language statements that require no technical background and are ideal for communicating between client and developer. At this point, use cases form the basis of our understanding of what the application should do. A sample use case might look like this:

"User should be able to log onto the system and be validated as either a user or administrator."

While use cases are wonderful for determining requirements for the application and for communicating with clients, they're too general to be of much use to developers. For this I rely on the skill of interface designers who understand how to translate the client's requirements into actual pages that show how they'll do it. This is the prototype I spoke of above. It's an iterative process; at each step we hopefully come closer to finding exactly what the client needs. Once all participants have agreed that the application is fully defined, we arrive at a prototype freeze. Now it's my job to match the use cases (as interpreted in the prototype) with one or more fuseactions.

Fuseactions, remember, define what the application is actively involved in; at any point there's only one fuseaction operating. A fuseaction is a request for action that's sent only to the fusebox (usually named index.cfm). It's fundamental to Fusebox that all requests for action go through the fusebox, not to individual fuses. Without this we're on a slippery slope where one fuse calls another and that fuse calls yet another until we end up with a tangled mess of intricate dependencies between fuses, defeating our goals of readability and reusability.

Once the request for action (the fuseaction) is sent to the fusebox, the fusebox calls on fuses to carry out the action. So the development process goes like this: use case ...> prototype ...> fuseaction(s) ...> fuse(s). By creating a table that shows the associations between use cases, fuses and fuseactions, I can see how complete my application architecture is. Table 1 is the table for this application.

As Dennis Miller says, "I don't want to get off on a rant here...," but let me say a word about naming fuses. The Fusebox.org site suggests naming prefixes for fuses based on the fuse's job: dsp_fusename for display-type fuses and so forth. I've heard heated debate over the "correct" naming scheme and I think this misses the key point - Fusebox is a development methodology, not a naming convention. My position is, if you find the naming scheme to be helpful, by all means use it. If you have another naming scheme - possibly already a standard within your company - then use that. The power of Fusebox doesn't depend on how a fuse is named, but on its clarity, conciseness and precision.

More Stories By Hal Helms

Hal Helms is a well-known speaker/writer/strategist on software development issues. He holds training sessions on Java, ColdFusion, and software development processes. He authors a popular monthly newsletter series. For more information, contact him at hal (at) halhelms.com or see his website, www.halhelms.com.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
"LinearHub provides smart video conferencing, which is the Roundee service, and we archive all the video conferences and we also provide the transcript," stated Sunghyuk Kim, CEO of LinearHub, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Things are changing so quickly in IoT that it would take a wizard to predict which ecosystem will gain the most traction. In order for IoT to reach its potential, smart devices must be able to work together. Today, there are a slew of interoperability standards being promoted by big names to make this happen: HomeKit, Brillo and Alljoyn. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Adam Justice, vice president and general manager of Grid Connect, will review what happens when smart devices don’t work togethe...
"There's a growing demand from users for things to be faster. When you think about all the transactions or interactions users will have with your product and everything that is between those transactions and interactions - what drives us at Catchpoint Systems is the idea to measure that and to analyze it," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York Ci...
The 20th International Cloud Expo has announced that its Call for Papers is open. Cloud Expo, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, brings together Cloud Computing, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, Containers, Microservices and WebRTC to one location. With cloud computing driving a higher percentage of enterprise IT budgets every year, it becomes increasingly important to plant your flag in this fast-expanding business opportunity. Submit your speaking proposal ...
Discover top technologies and tools all under one roof at April 24–28, 2017, at the Westin San Diego in San Diego, CA. Explore the Mobile Dev + Test and IoT Dev + Test Expo and enjoy all of these unique opportunities: The latest solutions, technologies, and tools in mobile or IoT software development and testing. Meet one-on-one with representatives from some of today's most innovative organizations
20th Cloud Expo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud strategy.
WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web communications world. The 6th WebRTC Summit continues our tradition of delivering the latest and greatest presentations within the world of WebRTC. Topics include voice calling, video chat, P2P file sharing, and use cases that have already leveraged the power and convenience of WebRTC.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Super Micro Computer, Inc., a global leader in Embedded and IoT solutions, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Supermicro (NASDAQ: SMCI), the leading innovator in high-performance, high-efficiency server technology, is a premier provider of advanced server Building Block Solutions® for Data Center, Cloud Computing, Enterprise IT, Hadoop/Big Data, HPC and E...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
WebRTC sits at the intersection between VoIP and the Web. As such, it poses some interesting challenges for those developing services on top of it, but also for those who need to test and monitor these services. In his session at WebRTC Summit, Tsahi Levent-Levi, co-founder of testRTC, reviewed the various challenges posed by WebRTC when it comes to testing and monitoring and on ways to overcome them.
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
WebRTC services have already permeated corporate communications in the form of videoconferencing solutions. However, WebRTC has the potential of going beyond and catalyzing a new class of services providing more than calls with capabilities such as mass-scale real-time media broadcasting, enriched and augmented video, person-to-machine and machine-to-machine communications. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Luis Lopez, CEO of Kurento, introduced the technologies required for implementing these idea...
Buzzword alert: Microservices and IoT at a DevOps conference? What could possibly go wrong? In this Power Panel at DevOps Summit, moderated by Jason Bloomberg, the leading expert on architecting agility for the enterprise and president of Intellyx, panelists peeled away the buzz and discuss the important architectural principles behind implementing IoT solutions for the enterprise. As remote IoT devices and sensors become increasingly intelligent, they become part of our distributed cloud enviro...
"A lot of times people will come to us and have a very diverse set of requirements or very customized need and we'll help them to implement it in a fashion that you can't just buy off of the shelf," explained Nick Rose, CTO of Enzu, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
The WebRTC Summit New York, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, announces that its Call for Papers is now open. Topics include all aspects of improving IT delivery by eliminating waste through automated business models leveraging cloud technologies. WebRTC Summit is co-located with 20th International Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo. WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web co...
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
For basic one-to-one voice or video calling solutions, WebRTC has proven to be a very powerful technology. Although WebRTC’s core functionality is to provide secure, real-time p2p media streaming, leveraging native platform features and server-side components brings up new communication capabilities for web and native mobile applications, allowing for advanced multi-user use cases such as video broadcasting, conferencing, and media recording.
Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.
WebRTC is about the data channel as much as about video and audio conferencing. However, basically all commercial WebRTC applications have been built with a focus on audio and video. The handling of “data” has been limited to text chat and file download – all other data sharing seems to end with screensharing. What is holding back a more intensive use of peer-to-peer data? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Dr Silvia Pfeiffer, WebRTC Applications Team Lead at National ICT Australia, looked at differ...
The security needs of IoT environments require a strong, proven approach to maintain security, trust and privacy in their ecosystem. Assurance and protection of device identity, secure data encryption and authentication are the key security challenges organizations are trying to address when integrating IoT devices. This holds true for IoT applications in a wide range of industries, for example, healthcare, consumer devices, and manufacturing. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lancen LaChance, vic...