Welcome!

ColdFusion Authors: Greg Ness, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Andreas Grabner, David Strom

Related Topics: Open Source

Open Source: Article

ODF vs OOXML: Google's Open Source Programs Manager Sideswipes Microsoft

OOXML "doesn't meet the criteria required for a globally-accepted standard," says Zaheda Bhorat

Zaheda Bhorat, Google's Open Source Programs Manager, has reiterated Google's position that Microsoft's Open Office XML (OOXML) 'doesn't meet the criteria required for a globally-accepted standard.' The comment comes as the deadline approaches for ISO member bodies around the world to possibly revise their September 2007 vote, when the original submission to ISO of OOXML as an additional international standard was defeated.

"After further technical analysis of the specification along with all the additional data available on OOXML," Bhorat asserts on the Official Google Blog, "Google believes OOXML would be an insufficient and unnecessary standard, designed purely around the needs of Microsoft Office."

Of the Open Document Format (ODF), the standard supported by Google, Bhorat notes:

"ODF is supported and implemented across the globe, and its communal creation and iteration has helped ensure the transparency, consistency and interoperability necessary in a workable standard."
"We join the ODF Alliance and many other experts in our belief that OOXML doesn't meet the criteria required for a globally-accepted standard," Bhorat writes, adding:
"A document standards decision may not matter to you today, but as someone who relies on constant access to editable documents, spreadsheets and presentations, it may matter immensely in the near future."

More Stories By Open Source News

Enterprise Open Source News Desk trawls the fast-growing world of Professional Open Source for business-relevant items of news, opinion, and insight.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.